Direction (Q.1-2): In each of the question below three statements are given followed by conclusion /group of conclusion
numbered I and II. You have to assume all the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known
facts and then decide which of the following given two conclusions logically follows from the information given in the
statements. Give answer
1) If only conclusion I follows.
2) If only conclusion II follows.
3) If either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.
4) If neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.
5) If both conclusion I and II follow.
1. Statements: Some buses are trains. Some trains are jets. All jets are scooters.
Conclusion: I.Some buses are scooters. II.Some trains are scooters.
2. Statements: Some soaps are detergents. No conditioner is soap.
All detergents are shampoo.
Conclusion: I.Some detergents are not conditioner. II.Some conditioners are not shampoo.
Directions: (Q.3-7): Each of the questions below consists of a question and two statements numbered I and II given below it. You have to decide whether the data given in the statements are sufficient to answer the questions. Read both the statements and give answer
1) If the data in statement I alone are sufficient to answer the question, while the data in statement II are not sufficient to answer the question.
2) If the data in statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question, while the data in statement I are not sufficient to answer the question.
3) If the data either in statement I alone or statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question.
4) If the data in statement I and statement II together are not sufficient to answer the question.
5) If the data in statement I and statement II together are necessary to answer the question.
3. P, Q, R, S and T are sitting in a row. What is the position of Q from the right end?
I.P is sitting at one end second right of S, who is the immediate neighbour of Q and R.
II.T is to the left of Q.
4. Who among M, P, J, K and A toy's is the cheapest but one?
I.P is costlier then K and A.
II.J is cheaper than A and M.
5. What is R's rank from the bottom in a class of 40 students? I.P's position fifth from the top and there are five students between P and R.
II.Q's position is seventh from bottom and there are four students between Q and K.
6. Who is the brother in law of Nitya?
I.Nitya is the mother of Vinita and is married to brother of Asha.
II.Nitin and Ashok are brothers of Asha. Lata is wife of Ashok
7. Toward which direction is A with respect to his starting point?
I.A walked 10m took a left turn and walked 15 m again took a left turn and walked 10m towards east.
II. A walked 15 m west, took a right turn and walked 10m again took a right turn and walked 15 m.
Directions (Q.8-10): Study the following information carefully to answer the given questions. The Noida Authority on December 2013 Pledged to clean its system of all kind of corruption to ensure better governance. The authority said that it was on its way to adopt a mechanism that left no room for corrupt practices and ensure timely completion of work.
A. New mechanism achieves better results.
B. Authority already minimised corruption.
C. Officials won't get a chance to harass people.
D. A lot of issue will be resolved without any efforts.
E. Level of corruption in Noida authority has increased.
8. Which among the following (A), (B), (C), (D) and (E) may be the reason behind the pledge of Noida authority?
1) Only A 2) Only D 3) Both B and C 4) Both D and E 5) Only E
9. Which among the following (A), (B),(C), (D) and (E) may be the possible effect of the above step?
1) Only B 2) Both B and C 3) Both D and E 4) Only A, C and D 5) Only A,B and D
10. Which among the following (A), (B), (C), (D) and (E) can be a strong argument in favour of the mechanism?
1) Only A 2) Only C 3) Both B and C 4) Both C and E 5) Only E
1.2; Some trains are jets + All jets are scooters = I+A=I = some trains are scooters. Thus, conclusion II follows. Some buses are trains + some trains are jets= I+I=no conclusion. Therefore conclusion I does not follow
2.1; No conditioner is a soap + some soaps are detergents= E+I=O = some detergent are not conditioners. Hence, I follows. But we can't proceeds further. Hence, II does not follow.
3.5; From I, we get, T Q S R P or T R S Q P. Thus I is
From II,we get, T Q. So II alone is not sufficient.
From I and II we get, T Q S R P. Thus, both the
statements are necessary.
4.4; From I, we get, P > K A. Thus, I is not sufficient.
From II, we get, A M > J. Thus, II is not sufficient.
Thus, neither I nor II sufficient.
5.1; From I ,we get, R's rank from Top = 5+5= 10 ,
R’s rank from bottom = 40-(5+5) = 30
From II we did not get, any relevent information about R
8.5; The sole reason behind the pledge is that ,there is increase in corruption in Noida authorities official and there practices.
9.4 ; If the level of corruption brings down it will resolve most of the problems and also due to good mechanism the corrupt officials can't get a chance to harass people.
10.1; Only option A states that new mechanism will achieve and produce better results.